From: Deane Yang (deane_yang_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-13 08:54:10
Andy Little wrote:
I think your approach makes more sense for
>> points in more than one dimension, where storing n-dimensional points as
>> (n+1)-vectors is less costly.
> As I understand it a grassman_point would only be used for intermediate results
> of an addition.
Good point. So what do you think of Noah's proposed syntax?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk