Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-13 11:35:44

Next message: Fernando Cacciola: "Re: [boost] Report from Mont Tremblant C++ Committee meeting"
Previous message: Thorsten Ottosen: "Re: [boost] Report from Mont Tremblant C++ Committee meeting"
In reply to: Deane Yang: "Re: [boost] Interest in dimension/unit-checking library?"
Next in thread: Andy Little: "Re: [boost] Interest in dimension/unit-checking library?"

"Deane Yang" wrote
> Andy Little wrote:
>> As I understand it a grassman_point would only be used for intermediate
>> results
>> of an addition.
>>
>
> Good point. So what do you think of Noah's proposed syntax?

If it can help to resolve one of the contentious problems at least regarding
multi-dimensional points, then I think it is a good thing. I guess I'll have to
try to implement it and see how it works out.

regards
Andy Little

Next message: Fernando Cacciola: "Re: [boost] Report from Mont Tremblant C++ Committee meeting"
Previous message: Thorsten Ottosen: "Re: [boost] Report from Mont Tremblant C++ Committee meeting"
In reply to: Deane Yang: "Re: [boost] Interest in dimension/unit-checking library?"
Next in thread: Andy Little: "Re: [boost] Interest in dimension/unit-checking library?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk