From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-14 12:51:47
David Abrahams wrote:
> This isn't about whose fault it was. I'm not gonna play the blame
> game ;-)
Come on. You're spoiling all the fun ;-)
> I'm just wondering, for those listening, whether the deep-copying
> smart pointers often used for the pimpl idiom raise the same concerns.
Good point. I am still unconvinced that the syntax for value access is a
good indicator for a type's copy semantics. auto_ptr anybody?
-- Thomas Witt witt_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk