Re: [boost] Report from Mont Tremblant C++ Committee meeting

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-14 12:51:47

David Abrahams wrote:
> 
> This isn't about whose fault it was.  I'm not gonna play the blame
> game ;-)

Come on. You're spoiling all the fun ;-)

> 
> I'm just wondering, for those listening, whether the deep-copying
> smart pointers often used for the pimpl idiom raise the same concerns.
> 

Good point. I am still unconvinced that the syntax for value access is a 
good indicator for a type's copy semantics. auto_ptr anybody?

Thomas

-- 
Thomas Witt
witt_at_[hidden]