From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-17 08:47:55
Joel de Guzman <joel_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Joel de Guzman <joel_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>>I *really* don't have an opinion about what the right choice should
>>>>be. That said, terms like gobbledegook seem needlessly judgemental,
>>>>and as such I think they only cloud the issues.
>>>But, IMO, it *is* unclear and wordy jargon (http://tinyurl.com/954xg)
>>>I find the explanation very difficult to follow.
>> I know what "gobbledegook" means; it's highly pejorative. A link to
>> the explanation in question would be more useful here.
> Oh, I forgot:
> To this day, I'm still befuddled at the explanation.
Except for the last paragraph -- which I agree is confusing but which
is also not needed to understand the rationale -- it seems perfectly
clear to me. Reasonable, too.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk