Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-17 08:58:16

Next message: Jose: "Re: [boost] RTL"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Report from Mont Tremblant C++ Committee meeting"
In reply to: Cromwell Enage: "[boost] [MPL.Math] big_integral and unsigned_big_integral"
Next in thread: Cromwell Enage: "Re: [boost] [MPL.Math] big_integral and unsigned_big_integral"
Reply: Cromwell Enage: "Re: [boost] [MPL.Math] big_integral and unsigned_big_integral"

Cromwell Enage <sponage_at_[hidden]> writes:

> In a future version I'll probably get rid of
> positive_sign and negative_sign and just have the user
> specify '+' or '-'.

I consider that essential.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Jose: "Re: [boost] RTL"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Report from Mont Tremblant C++ Committee meeting"
In reply to: Cromwell Enage: "[boost] [MPL.Math] big_integral and unsigned_big_integral"
Next in thread: Cromwell Enage: "Re: [boost] [MPL.Math] big_integral and unsigned_big_integral"
Reply: Cromwell Enage: "Re: [boost] [MPL.Math] big_integral and unsigned_big_integral"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk