Re: [boost] RTL

From: Arkadiy Vertleyb (vertleyb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-17 19:00:24

"Calum Grant" <calum_at_[hidden]> wrote
> The problem with this data is that it contains a lot of duplicates.  If
> I cluster the cities into 5103 clusters, I get 47ms.  On the other hand
> if I don't cluster them, then I get 4.1s.  The expensive part is
> building the index of indexing on distances.  The results are rather odd
> - the 500 locations I get have 991 neighbours.

This sounds like a correct result -- can I see the first 50 items?

Regards,
Arkadiy