|
Boost : |
From: Robert Kawulak (kawulak_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-23 17:38:30
> From: Neal Becker
> I'm thinking something like this:
>
> template<typename checker_t>
> class bounded {...
> bounded (checker_t check) ...
>
> assign () { check (value); }
This is quite similar to what I was going to implement.
> allow checking to be inlined. I guessing the size of a bounded object
> would not necessarily be increased.
If you store checker as a member then the size would certainly be increased
even if checker_t is empty. I'm going to use
boost::compressed_pair<value_type, checker_t> to avoid this. I could
privately inherit from checker_t instead, but I want the value_type member
sub-object to be the first in the object to optimise access to it.
Best regards,
Robert
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk