Boost logo

Boost :

From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-24 10:03:34

On Oct 24, 2005, at 4:43 AM, John Maddock wrote:

>> They might be fixable (they probably are), but regardless, I don't
>> see
>> why they should need to be marked up: it's a new test, so it doesn't
>> represent a regression.
> Understood, I'd just like to see 1.33.1 go all green so it can be
> released
> :-)
> If that compiler is a release requirement, then shouldn't all tests
> either
> pass or be marked up? (and no that's not a rhetorical question!).

Yes. We need zero *failures*, not just zero regressions, to roll the
next release.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at