Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-24 12:40:17

Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On Oct 24, 2005, at 4:43 AM, John Maddock wrote:
>>> They might be fixable (they probably are), but regardless, I don't
>>> see
>>> why they should need to be marked up: it's a new test, so it doesn't
>>> represent a regression.
>> Understood, I'd just like to see 1.33.1 go all green so it can be
>> released
>> :-)
>> If that compiler is a release requirement, then shouldn't all tests
>> either
>> pass or be marked up? (and no that's not a rhetorical question!).
> Yes. We need zero *failures*, not just zero regressions, to roll the
> next release.

Okay, nailing those now.

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at