Re: [boost] [parameter][1.33.1] last few failures

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-24 12:40:17

Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On Oct 24, 2005, at 4:43 AM, John Maddock wrote:
>
>>> They might be fixable (they probably are), but regardless, I don't  
>>> see
>>> why they should need to be marked up: it's a new test, so it doesn't
>>> represent a regression.
>>>
>>
>> Understood, I'd just like to see 1.33.1 go all green so it can be  
>> released
>> :-)
>>
>> If that compiler is a release requirement, then shouldn't all tests  
>> either
>> pass or be marked up?  (and no that's not a rhetorical question!).
>
> Yes. We need zero *failures*, not just zero regressions, to roll the  
> next release.

Okay, nailing those now.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com