From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-24 12:40:17
Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Oct 24, 2005, at 4:43 AM, John Maddock wrote:
>>> They might be fixable (they probably are), but regardless, I don't
>>> why they should need to be marked up: it's a new test, so it doesn't
>>> represent a regression.
>> Understood, I'd just like to see 1.33.1 go all green so it can be
>> If that compiler is a release requirement, then shouldn't all tests
>> pass or be marked up? (and no that's not a rhetorical question!).
> Yes. We need zero *failures*, not just zero regressions, to roll the
> next release.
Okay, nailing those now.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk