Re: [boost] [iterator] huge differences in compile time between iterator_facade and iterator helpers

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-26 12:01:46

David Abrahams wrote:
> Joaquín Mª López Muñoz <joaquin_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
> 
> I had to modify the test to eliminate undefined behavior and make sure
> dead code elimination didn't kick in (enclosed).  Results:
> 
> GCC 3.4.4:
>   Test 1 discarded
> 
>   Test 2
>     with operator library: 1.469
>     with iterator library: 2.282
> 
>   Test 3
>     with operator library: 1.438
>     with iterator library: 2.297
> 
> GCC 4.0.2:
>   Test 1 discarded
> 
>   Test 2
>     with operator library: 1.468
>     with iterator library: 1.579
> 
>   Test 3
>     with operator library: 1.453
>     with iterator library: 1.563
> 
> MSVC 7.1
>   Test 1 discarded
> 
>   Test 2
>     with operator library: 1.219
>     with iterator library: 1.187
> 
>   Test 3
>     with operator library: 1.203
>     with iterator library: 1.188
> 

Sorry for being dumb but is this compile time or run time?

Thomas

-- 
Thomas Witt
witt_at_[hidden]