Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-26 12:40:14

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [parameter][1.33.1] last few failures"
Previous message: Matt Calabrese: "Re: [boost] Interest in dimension/unit-checking library?"
In reply to: Thomas Witt: "Re: [boost] [iterator] huge differences in compile time between iterator_facade and iterator helpers"
Next in thread: Thomas Witt: "Re: [boost] [iterator] huge differences in compile time between iterator_facade and iterator helpers"
Reply: Thomas Witt: "Re: [boost] [iterator] huge differences in compile time between iterator_facade and iterator helpers"

Thomas Witt <witt_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Joaquín Mª López Muñoz <joaquin_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>
>>
>> I had to modify the test to eliminate undefined behavior and make sure
>> dead code elimination didn't kick in (enclosed). Results:
>>
>
> Sorry for being dumb but is this compile time or run time?

Runtime.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [parameter][1.33.1] last few failures"
Previous message: Matt Calabrese: "Re: [boost] Interest in dimension/unit-checking library?"
In reply to: Thomas Witt: "Re: [boost] [iterator] huge differences in compile time between iterator_facade and iterator helpers"
Next in thread: Thomas Witt: "Re: [boost] [iterator] huge differences in compile time between iterator_facade and iterator helpers"
Reply: Thomas Witt: "Re: [boost] [iterator] huge differences in compile time between iterator_facade and iterator helpers"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk