Re: [boost] [Serialization] Boost regression notification (2005-10-26 [RC_1_33_0])

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-26 13:56:58

Doug Gregor wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2005, at 12:00 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
> 
>>|serialization|
>>  test_class_info_load_binary_archive:  borland-5_6_4  cw-8_3  cw-9_4  
>>cw-9_5-darwin  gcc-3_4_3-sunos  mingw-3_4_2  vc-6_5  vc-7_0
>>  test_class_info_load_binary_archive_dll:  borland-5_6_4  cw-9_4  
>>cw-9_5-darwin  gcc-3_4_3-sunos  intel-win32-8_1  mingw-3_4_2  vc-6_5  
>>vc-7_0
>>  test_class_info_load_text_archive:  borland-5_6_4  cw-8_3  cw-9_4  
>>gcc-3_4_3-sunos  mingw-3_4_2  vc-6_5  vc-7_0
>>  test_class_info_load_text_archive_dll:  borland-5_6_4  cw-9_4  
>>gcc-3_4_3-sunos  intel-win32-8_1  mingw-3_4_2  vc-6_5  vc-7_0
>>  test_class_info_load_text_warchive:  borland-5_6_4  cw-8_3  cw-9_4  
>>gcc-3_4_3-sunos  vc-7_0
>>  test_class_info_load_text_warchive_dll:  borland-5_6_4  cw-9_4  
>>gcc-3_4_3-sunos  intel-win32-8_1  vc-7_0
>>  test_class_info_load_xml_archive:  borland-5_6_4  cw-8_3  cw-9_4  
>>cw-9_5-darwin  gcc-3_4_3-sunos  mingw-3_4_2  vc-6_5  vc-7_0
>>  test_class_info_load_xml_archive_dll:  borland-5_6_4  cw-9_4  
>>cw-9_5-darwin  gcc-3_4_3-sunos  intel-win32-8_1  mingw-3_4_2  vc-6_5  
>>vc-7_0
>>  test_class_info_load_xml_warchive:  borland-5_6_4  cw-8_3  cw-9_4  
>>gcc-3_4_3-sunos  vc-6_5  vc-7_0
>>  test_class_info_load_xml_warchive_dll:  borland-5_6_4  cw-9_4  
>>gcc-3_4_3-sunos  intel-win32-8_1  vc-6_5  vc-7_0
>>  test_demo_xml_load:  borland-5_6_4  gcc-3_4_3-sunos  gcc-4_0-darwin  
>>intel-win32-8_1  mingw-3_4_2
>>  test_demo_xml_load_dll:  borland-5_6_4  gcc-3_4_3-sunos  
>>gcc-4_0-darwin  mingw-3_4_2
>>  test_shared_ptr_132_text_warchive:  intel-win32-8_1
> 
> Eeep! The looks like more dependency issues, but it's hard to tell 
> what's going on. Help?

1) The cw-9_5-darwin failures are because some of the save tests failed. 
And since _all_ the load tests depend on _all_ the save tests it doesn't 
bother running them.

2) The rest I think are bogus errors as: a) the save tests pass for them 
and hence isn't issue (1); b) when one looks at the tests they point to 
other toolsets or errors (this is likely the strange delay processing 
errors we've seen before); and c) for similar configurations, i.e. the 
Bronek mingw-3.4.2 tests and my RSI mingw-3.4.2 test, fail on one and 
pass on the other the only difference being my tests are more recent.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org