Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-26 13:40:48

Next message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [boost] [Serialization] Boost regression notification (2005-10-26 [RC_1_33_0])"
Previous message: Jonathan Turkanis: "Re: [boost] [iostreams] Why devices must be copy-constructible?"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [iterator] huge differences in compile time between iterator_facade and iterator helpers"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [iterator] huge differences in compile time between iterator_facade and iterator helpers"
Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [iterator] huge differences in compile time between iterator_facade and iterator helpers"

David Abrahams wrote:
> Thomas Witt <witt_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> Joaquín Mª López Muñoz <joaquin_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>> I had to modify the test to eliminate undefined behavior and make sure
>>> dead code elimination didn't kick in (enclosed). Results:
>>>
>> Sorry for being dumb but is this compile time or run time?
>
> Runtime.

AFAICS Joaquín's question is with respect to compiletime.

Thomas

-- 
Thomas Witt
witt_at_[hidden]

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk