Re: [boost] alignment trouble with boost::optional

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-28 12:51:59

"Fernando Cacciola" <fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Michael Shepanski wrote:
>> On 10/27/05, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> FWIW, there is sound (IMO at least) alignment proposal for the std, so we 
> may not need to worry anymore about this in the not so distant future.

I don't think that proposal gives us any more guarantees than we have
today.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com