From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-02 09:45:51
On Nov 2, 2005, at 3:57 AM, Stefan Slapeta wrote:
> Jeff Garland wrote:
>> In date-time this is easy b/c all these calls are in about 20
>> lines of code.
>> This solution silences both library and user build -- allowing the
>> user to
>> decide on whether they want the warnings for their own code.
> I think this is a nice solution but I'm not sure whether 1.33.1
> could be
> reopened for these changes which would affect many header files in
1.33.1 cannot be reopened for these changes. We need to answer this
with either the sledgehammer approach (defining
_SCL_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE in a config header) or with some documentation.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk