From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-06 09:08:57
Alan Gutierrez wrote:
>>>That's one of my main criticisms of your suggested API --- it's
>>>too tightly bound to libxml, and doesn't really allow for
>>>substitution of another parser.
>>Could you substantiate your claim ?
> Sorting out exception handling, though and event framework like
> a push parser framework is no small challenge.
> I've always been critical of the Java SAXException, it is
> checked, and it cannot wrap a runtime expcetion, two choices
> that maximize the chanllenges of tunneling exceptions.
The probable addition of a cursor / event based API aside, I'd
really prefer we focus on the DOM API I proposed. It's totally
independent from SAX /XmlReader, and so we may be able to agree
on something fast.
>>Polymorphism is important for extensibility. However here the set
>>of node types is well known (and rather limited).
> What about a Post-Schema Valiation Infoset PSVI? With XMLSchema
> the types of nodes are unlimited.
That's an interesting point, and I have been waiting for this to
get raised. :-)
I'm not sure, though, that such a node (element ?) type system
should live at the same level as the suggested DOM layer, as opposed
to on top of it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk