From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-06 11:51:47
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>> What about a Post-Schema Valiation Infoset PSVI? With XMLSchema
>> the types of nodes are unlimited.
> That's an interesting point, and I have been waiting for this to
> get raised. :-)
> I'm not sure, though, that such a node (element ?) type system
> should live at the same level as the suggested DOM layer, as opposed
> to on top of it.
To illustrate my point a bit, consider this:
Since we are talking about domain-specific extensions here, users
of the library would have to provide their own node factories, and
the nodes it creates would most likely contain some user-provided
state which applications would manipulate later on.
This is one example where modularization is important, i.e.
instead of designing such a facility right into the parser, and
complicating its design even for all those users who have no interest
in XML Schema.
Instead, I propose the parser to generate a generic dom as suggested,
and then provide a schema validator that *translates* the generic dom
into a tree of typed nodes, where the actual types are provided by
users, for specific application domains.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk