Re: [boost] [MPL.Math] advanced metafunctions (Was: updates for double)

From: Cromwell Enage (sponage_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-11 14:21:10

--- Peder Holt wrote:
> I would prefer it if we dropped the
> BOOST_MPL_MATH_DOUBLE in the definition of the
> pi-constant for double. This because
> BOOST_MPL_MATH_DOUBLE gives less presicion than
> string_c_to_double.

Done.

> Numeric tag metafunction does not ring well in my
> ears.  I'll give it some thought.

Perhaps "Tagged Constant" sounds better.

(API-breaking change: boost::mpl::math::zero now
models this concept; it accepts a numeric tag as its
parameter, no longer a numeric constant.)

                              Cromwell D. Enage

        
                
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com