From: Cromwell Enage (sponage_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-11 14:21:10
--- Peder Holt wrote:
> I would prefer it if we dropped the
> BOOST_MPL_MATH_DOUBLE in the definition of the
> pi-constant for double. This because
> BOOST_MPL_MATH_DOUBLE gives less presicion than
> Numeric tag metafunction does not ring well in my
> ears. I'll give it some thought.
Perhaps "Tagged Constant" sounds better.
(API-breaking change: boost::mpl::math::zero now
models this concept; it accepts a numeric tag as its
parameter, no longer a numeric constant.)
Cromwell D. Enage
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk