Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Logging review result

From: Pavel Antokolsky aka Zigmar (zigmar_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-17 09:28:30

I would like to thank John Torjo for the great effort. I believe, even
the current library design and implementation is good and can be used
efficiently in real projects.  I understand how hard is to develop
general-purpose library that answer the needs of different people,
especially in case of such demanded library as logging. I want to
encourage John to continue library development and I'm looking forward
to the moment the library will finally accepted to the boost.

--
Best regards,
Zigmar
On 11/16/05, Hartmut Kaiser <hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> today I got the following message from John Torjo:
>
> <quote>
> Due to the feedback I got, I would like you to declare the library as
> rejected. In the light of what Gennady and others have said, indeed, another
> interface would be best suited for the Boost Log library.
>
> With what I know now, I would like to redesign the library from ground up,
> and ask for another review, probably 6 months from now or so.
> </quote>
>
> In the light of this announcement the review of the proposed Boost.Logging
> library submitted by John is closed. The library is not included into Boost.
> I very much hope John will find the time and energy to redesign and resubmit
> the library in the future.
>
> Regards Hartmut
> Review Manager