From: Michael Goldshteyn (mgoldshteyn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-17 10:13:51
"Pavel Vozenilek" <pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> "Korcan Hussein" wrote:
>> FC++ being worked on (to be re-reviewed for boost in the not to distant
> FC++ was reviewed (cca year ago) with negative result.
> I am not sure how much of work has been done on it afterwards.
Do you or anyone else have any recollection on why it got a negative result
to its review?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk