Boost logo

Boost :

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-30 08:34:22


> As mentioned above, I've extended the runtime tests to
> avoid this sort of typo creeping through again. I also
> copied the files that you sent to Joel into boost/tr1
> and libs/tr1/test. I then ran all the tests with bjam
> -sTOOLS=gcc. Amongst the mass of messages, it seemed
> that tuple_test compiled, with some warnings about
> unused variables. I believe this is a compile time
> test, so this constitutes success? I hope this is how
> the tests were supposed to be run, if not just give me
> some pointers.

Looks OK now: there are two tuple test cases in TR1, so:

bjam test_tuple test_tuple_tricky

builds the tests, and yes they both build Ok now, and yes they're just
compile-time conceptual tests.

Thanks,

John.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk