Boost logo

Boost :

From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-30 19:22:36


John Maddock wrote:
>>As mentioned above, I've extended the runtime tests to
>>avoid this sort of typo creeping through again. I also
>>copied the files that you sent to Joel into boost/tr1
>>and libs/tr1/test. I then ran all the tests with bjam
>>-sTOOLS=gcc. Amongst the mass of messages, it seemed
>>that tuple_test compiled, with some warnings about
>>unused variables. I believe this is a compile time
>>test, so this constitutes success? I hope this is how
>>the tests were supposed to be run, if not just give me
>>some pointers.
>
>
> Looks OK now: there are two tuple test cases in TR1, so:
>
> bjam test_tuple test_tuple_tricky
>
> builds the tests, and yes they both build Ok now, and yes they're just
> compile-time conceptual tests.

Nice! I'd like to take this opportunity to thank Dan Masden.
Dan, you rock! Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk