Re: [boost] Threads Documentation degradation v1.32 -> v1.33

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-04 12:17:32

"Job Mulder" <Job_at_[hidden]> writes:

> There appear to be a lot of missing words in the 1.33 version of the
> Boost.Threads documentation. Most notably, all "Boost.Threads" terms
> seem to have been removed from all the pages. This makes the document
> somewhat hard to read...

I knew the threads library needed more attention than it was getting,
but IMO, this is unacceptable for the release.  Can something be done
about it?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com