From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-04 12:47:29
On Dec 4, 2005, at 12:17 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
> "Job Mulder" <Job_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> There appear to be a lot of missing words in the 1.33 version of the
>> Boost.Threads documentation. Most notably, all "Boost.Threads" terms
>> seem to have been removed from all the pages. This makes the document
>> somewhat hard to read...
> I knew the threads library needed more attention than it was getting,
> but IMO, this is unacceptable for the release. Can something be done
> about it?
It's not nearly as bad as it sounds :) The problem was caused by a
bug in xsltproc's entity resolution. I've updated to the newest
version of the xsltproc and regenerated the documentation; everything
is fine now.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk