Re: [boost] Threads Documentation degradation v1.32 -> v1.33

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-04 19:21:46

Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On Dec 4, 2005, at 12:17 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
>
>> "Job Mulder" <Job_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>
>>> There appear to be a lot of missing words in the 1.33 version of the
>>> Boost.Threads documentation. Most notably, all "Boost.Threads" terms
>>> seem to have been removed from all the pages. This makes the document
>>> somewhat hard to read...
>>
>> I knew the threads library needed more attention than it was getting,
>> but IMO, this is unacceptable for the release.  Can something be done
>> about it?
>
> It's not nearly as bad as it sounds :) The problem was caused by a  
> bug in xsltproc's entity resolution. I've updated to the newest  
> version of the xsltproc and regenerated the documentation; everything  
> is fine now.

Thanks, Doug!

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com