From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-06 16:06:01
Thomas Witt wrote:
>>>Agreed, we do need a way to identify patch releases. There is a clear
>>>distinction between the kind of changes allowed in a 1.X and a 1.X.Y
>>Yes, though these questions only concern the release management (i.e.
> I am not sure I understand you correctly. AFAICS this is of concern to
> the users in terms of API compatibility, likeliness of regressions and
Is there any guarantee about what can and can not change between major
and minor releases ? If so, it should be documented. If not, i.e. if it
is only a matter of 'likeliness', I honestly don't see much point in
trying to draw a distinction.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk