Re: [boost] [TR1] Help wanted with MWCW-9.4

From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-11 09:41:48

On Dec 11, 2005, at 2:53 AM, Daryle Walker wrote:

> I don't
> know how different it is from CWP9.  Nor do I know how much of a  
> difference
> is there between the free and full versions.

Fwiw, it has a full implementation of the rvalue reference.

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2002/n1377.htm
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1855.html
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1856.html
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1857.html
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1858.html
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1859.html
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1860.html
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1861.html
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1862.html

Except that std::unique_ptr is named Metrowerks::move_ptr.

The rvalue reference functionality is off by default but you can turn  
it on with:

#pragma rvalue_refs on

in your preprocessor prefix text.

> Anyway, I think Metrowerks is still providing compilers for embedded
> markets.

Yup.

-Howard