From: Christopher Kohlhoff (chris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-22 06:03:23
--- Eugene Alterman <eugalt_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> "Christopher Kohlhoff" <chris_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > For asynchronous operations, the fact that a demultiplexer is
> > used is an implementation detail. The public interface of asio
> > does not prohibit an implementation that uses, say, a thread per
> > operation.
> Does it make any difference?
> Thread completion still needs to be demultiplexed.
Let me put my point another way:
Knowledge of the existence of demultiplexing, or any other
method for implementing asynchronous I/O, is not a prerequisite
for the use or understanding of asynchronous operations.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk