Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Logging: formal review

From: John Torjo (john.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-23 18:10:56

> I for one agree with Richard that any macro interface to logging should work
> by surrounding the entire invocation in parens, not just the log object.  It
> would remove the need for the enabled_logger class and the additional heap
> allocation of the stream.
> 
Yes, you're right. If I can't eliminate the creation of the stream, I'll 
prefer that.

But as Gennady said, I will make it possible for you to create your own 
macros -- I'll just provide the means ;)

Best,
John

-- 
John Torjo,    Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal
-- "Win32 GUI Generics" -- generics & GUI do mix, after all
-- http://www.torjo.com/win32gui/surfaces.html - Sky's the limit!
-- http://www.torjo.com/cb/ - Click, Build, Run!