From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-05 12:57:19
Eric Niebler wrote:
> Resending with a more appropriate subject ....
> Noel Belcourt wrote:
>>There is a problem compiling Xpressive's test_static and test_dynamic
>>with CW 9.6. The error is in test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp, lines
>># include <unistd.h>
>># include <signal.h>
>># include <setjmp.h>
>>These include files are defined in CW's standard library (MSL) and they
>>hide the ones in /usr/include. The MSL doesn't seem to define the full
>>(or maybe the correct) set of signal handling functions and structures.
>>Xpressive's test_static and test_dynamic compile and run without error
>>if I change the includes to
>># include </usr/include/unistd.h>
>># include </usr/include/signal.h>
>># include </usr/include/setjmp.h>
>>Can anyone suggest a workaround for this?
As an experiment, I have changed xpressive's regression test to not use
Boost.Test. The results are perplexing. The runtime crash went away on
cw-9_4 but remains on cw-9_5-darwin. I don't know about cw-9_6. It's
possible that it has something to do with the fact that the 9.4 test is
run on Win32 and the 9.5 test on Darwin. Is there is another header
pulling in CW's buggy versions of unistd.h/signal.h/setjmp.h on this
Can someone with CodeWarrior/Mac (any version) sync boost/xpressive and
libs/xpressive and try running xpressive's "test1"? A stack backtrace
would shed some light.
-- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk