Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-08 21:02:14

Next message: Arkadiy Vertleyb: "Re: [boost] [typeof] MSVC8 limits & preprocessing typeof/vector.hpp"
Previous message: Achilleas Margaritis: "[boost] library proposal: garbage collection"
In reply to: Douglas Gregor: "Re: [boost] Should we still be testing GCC 2.95.3?"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Should we still be testing GCC 2.95.3?"
Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Should we still be testing GCC 2.95.3?"

On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:50:14 -0500, Douglas Gregor wrote
> On Jan 8, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
> > I could just mark all the failures as expected, but if no one
> > cares anymore
> > then we ought to stop testing 2.95.3, free up the testing resources
> > and stop
> > pestering Boost developers about 2.95.3 failures.
>
> Seems like a good idea. Let's get rid of 2.95.3.

I concur -- it's time to drop support for this old thing.

Jeff

Next message: Arkadiy Vertleyb: "Re: [boost] [typeof] MSVC8 limits & preprocessing typeof/vector.hpp"
Previous message: Achilleas Margaritis: "[boost] library proposal: garbage collection"
In reply to: Douglas Gregor: "Re: [boost] Should we still be testing GCC 2.95.3?"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Should we still be testing GCC 2.95.3?"
Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Should we still be testing GCC 2.95.3?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk