From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-08 21:45:49
"Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:50:14 -0500, Douglas Gregor wrote
>> On Jan 8, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
>> > I could just mark all the failures as expected, but if no one
>> > cares anymore
>> > then we ought to stop testing 2.95.3, free up the testing resources
>> > and stop
>> > pestering Boost developers about 2.95.3 failures.
>> Seems like a good idea. Let's get rid of 2.95.3.
> I concur -- it's time to drop support for this old thing.
Again I have to ask: what does it mean for Boost to support (or not) a
Maybe we ought to be instituting a firmer notion of what "supported"
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk