From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-10 21:01:26
David Abrahams wrote:
> Edward Diener <eddielee_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>So while I have always been a supporter of
>>Borland in the past I do not see that they are serious about fixing
>>their compiler bugs, or even consider it important to do so.
> Maybe we should move on, then. At this point they may need us more
> than we need them.
Discussions of "us" (Boost) and "them" (Borland) is leaving someone out:
the developers who need both us /and/ them to play nice. That said, I
haven't seen any Borland regression results in a loooong time. Borland
support is pretty much a non-starter unless we can get regular test results.
-- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk