Re: [boost] Should we still be testing GCC 2.95.3?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-12 15:57:24

"Eric Niebler" <eric_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Edward Diener <eddielee_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> 
>>>So while I have always been a supporter of 
>>>Borland in the past I do not see that they are serious about fixing 
>>>their compiler bugs, or even consider it important to do so.
>> 
>> 
>> Maybe we should move on, then.  At this point they may need us more
>> than we need them.
>> 
>
> Discussions of "us" (Boost) and "them" (Borland) is leaving someone out: 
> the developers who need both us /and/ them to play nice. 

No developers _need_ us to play nice with Borland in 1.34.  Anyone
currently using Boost could stick with 1.33.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com