From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-22 07:55:21
Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
> "Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> wrote
>>Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
>>>"Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> wrote
>>>Why not? I don't understand... If, for example, a Spirit header includes
>>>an MPL header, the corresponding Spirit registration header would include
>>>the corresponding MPL registration header.
>>>So, if I include the Spirit registration header, I automatically get needed
>>>MPL types registered, won't I?
>>Spirit and MPL are both part of Boost. I was talking about a third party library
>>in between user and Boost code.
> In my above statement replace "Spirit" with "third party library". What is
> going to change?
Spirit knows about Typeof, an arbitrary third party library might not.
> It would be helpful to also get the opinion of other library authors that
> are planning/considering to add typeof support to their libraries. After
> all, Boost libraries are maintained independently, and, in order to
> implement any effective policy, we need to reach a consensus.
That would be great.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk