From: MB (mb2act_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-30 16:29:24
David Abrahams wrote:
> MB <mb2act_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>>>I have been trimming boost.range to incorporate the changes we have been
>>>discussing some time ago.
>>>These changes will break many uses of the library. Inside boost this
>>>(*) I don't this will break
>>>The list of major changes is the follwing:
>>>1. ADL hooks renamed boost_range_begin -> range_begin,
>>> boost_range_end -> range_end
>>Why was such short name accepted??
>>Even 'const_begin' that calls unqualified 'begin' breaks down Boost.MPL!!
> How so? What happens? Got a small reproducible case?
typedef dummy< ::boost::mpl::vector< int > > vt ;
typedef ::std::vector< const vt* > ct ;
boost::const_begin( ct() ) ;
(though I don't know whether or not this GCC behavior is conforming.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk