Re: [boost] towards a library dependency list

From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-11 07:41:43

"Peter Dimov"
> Andy Little wrote:

>> "my library  (currently?) depends on the following modules:
>>
>> mpl
>> preprocessor.
>> type_traits
>
> It doesn't, not in its default configuration. Only quick_allocator depends
> on type_traits.

Its technically correct then... only confusing. I consider that reasonable
without making the dependency crawler incredibly complicated.

For the dependency list to make sense, would require a reorganisation of some of
the odds and ends in the current boost tree as I suggested above. shared_ptr
would then depend on whatever module quick_allocator was put in.

regards
Andy Little