Re: [boost] towards a library dependency list

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-11 06:25:00

Andy Little wrote:
> "John Maddock"  wrote
>
> [...]
>
>> Now, here's the question: what did the folks who were asking for this
>> functionality actually want to use the information for?
>
> I didnt ask, but it strikes me that this could be a way towards a
> more modular boost.
>
> Now shared_ptr author can say,
>
> "my library  (currently?) depends on the following modules:
>
> mpl
> preprocessor.
> type_traits

It doesn't, not in its default configuration. Only quick_allocator depends 
on type_traits.