From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-11 16:31:15
David Abrahams wrote:
> "Robert Ramey" <ramey_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> I was expecting to see your enhancements for arrays to get
>> included and for collection_size (or whatever) to be part of this.
>> I'm not sure what status of this is and/or if it conflicts with the
>> recent feature
> IMO the size_type change should be considered a bugfix, as it was not
> possible to portably serialize collections without it.
The change is not trivial. Using a size_t typedef means that program A can
write an unsigned int and program B can read an unsigned long. This will
appear to work at first because the serialization library doesn't include
archives where this is significant. Yet.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk