Re: [boost] [feature freeze] range issue

From: Thorsten Ottosen (tottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-17 08:32:03

Thomas Witt wrote:
> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> 
>>Thomas,
>>
>>Do you have anything to add to the discussion on committing
>>the new version of boost.range?
> 
> 
> Sorry for the late reply my internet connectivity over the last few days 
> was worse than expected.
> 
> Given the fact that we don't want destabilizing changes in feature 
> freeze I would really like to move this to 1.35.

I dno't like it. For one, bug-fixes must be applied again in a 
freah-check out. Secondly, people will keep on using the wrong
protocol for range conformance.

Can't we just roll-back to the current cvs if we cannot stabalize it 
within, say, a week?

-Thorsten