|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-17 09:32:26
Paul Giaccone <paulg_at_[hidden]> writes:
> These descriptions are clearly intended to be used by the existing user
> as a reference guide, and they are fine in that respect. They don't,
> however, act as a lure to potential users. They don't tell me how each
> library could vastly improve the efficiency and reliably of my C++
> programs. In short, they don't make me want to start using Boost this
> instant and wonder how I ever managed without it.
>
> On the other hand, the documentation Beth is proposing does get my
> interest about Boost. It points out what it can do for me and makes me
> want to use it, and it does it straight away. My view is that Beth's
> content (with appropriate revisions - it is clearly not yet complete or
> as good as it could be) should be adopted and linked to prominently from
> the main page.
I agree with your analysis. It can be hard for those of use who've
been around Boost forever to notice the deficiencies. It would be
great if you and Beth could work with Rene on the new website
structure, specifically addressing issues such as this.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk