Boost logo

Boost :

From: Sean Huang (huangsean_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-18 01:37:16


From: "Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]>

>> On the other hand, std::basic_ostringstream/std::basic_istringstream
>> do not suffer the same memory leak. And maybe data_time library can
>> change to use them instead of std::basic_stringstream (line 304 in
>> time_facet.hpp as of release 1.33.0). I haven't really looked into
>> data_time library so I can not say this for sure.
>
> Perhaps it would work, but I have to say I feel highly unmotivated to
> spend my
> time working trying to work around this vendor bug. This bug is bad
> enough
> that anyone seriously using C++ will have to use the workaround patch
> available on the MS website.
>
> Jeff

I can totally understand your reluctance. This is really a show-stopper bug
for many of us. But your efforts will certainly be appreciated by many boost
users. You could also consider the work-around as a minor improvement if I
undertsand it correctly.

Best regards,

Sean


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk