Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Timo Geusch (timo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-19 03:17:44

Next message: Beth Jacobson: "Re: [boost] [website] Proposal for new page - Libraries By Type"
Previous message: martin.ecker_at_[hidden]: "Re: [boost] [shared_ptr] utility for shared-only classes"
In reply to: Alexei Alexandrov: "[boost] [program_options] Old Dinkumware STL compilation"
Next in thread: Alexei Alexandrov: "Re: [boost] [program_options] Old Dinkumware STL compilation"
Reply: Alexei Alexandrov: "Re: [boost] [program_options] Old Dinkumware STL compilation"

Alexei Alexandrov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get some of Boost libraries compiled for Windows ia64 and x86_64. The build environment is rather strange: good compiler + bad old STL (Dinkumware). I cannot change it - this is what Microsoft ships with Platform SDK for those platforms. Ultimate solution would be to migrate to VS2005, but not for now...
>
Is there anything that would prevent you from grabbing STLport and use
that instead of the old Dinkumware STL?

Next message: Beth Jacobson: "Re: [boost] [website] Proposal for new page - Libraries By Type"
Previous message: martin.ecker_at_[hidden]: "Re: [boost] [shared_ptr] utility for shared-only classes"
In reply to: Alexei Alexandrov: "[boost] [program_options] Old Dinkumware STL compilation"
Next in thread: Alexei Alexandrov: "Re: [boost] [program_options] Old Dinkumware STL compilation"
Reply: Alexei Alexandrov: "Re: [boost] [program_options] Old Dinkumware STL compilation"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk