Re: [boost] [important] Preparing to Test Release Builds

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-20 10:12:15

David Abrahams wrote:
> "Daniel James" <daniel_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
>> On 2/19/06, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Daniel James <daniel_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> 
>>>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>>>> Why is hashing located under functional?  The functional library
>>>>> is deprecated, IIRC.
>>>> 
>>>> Because it's based on the TR1 hash functions, which are in
>>>> <functional>. 
>>> 
>>> Hm.  I'm not sure if that's a good enough reason.  Or maybe we
>>> should get the other stuff that's in there out of that directory.
>> 
>> Well, I don't really mind where it goes, I'll happily follow the
>> consensus. 
> 
> I guess as long as functional.hpp isn't deprecated, it's fine where it
> is.  But I like the idea that things built specifically for tr1
> compatibility should go in boost/tr1/...

boost/hash/ will do fine. <waves hand>