Re: [boost] [important] Preparing to Test Release Builds

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-20 12:03:29

"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> "Daniel James" <daniel_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> 
>>> On 2/19/06, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>> Daniel James <daniel_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>> 
>>>>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>>>>> Why is hashing located under functional?  The functional library
>>>>>> is deprecated, IIRC.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Because it's based on the TR1 hash functions, which are in
>>>>> <functional>. 
>>>> 
>>>> Hm.  I'm not sure if that's a good enough reason.  Or maybe we
>>>> should get the other stuff that's in there out of that directory.
>>> 
>>> Well, I don't really mind where it goes, I'll happily follow the
>>> consensus. 
>> 
>> I guess as long as functional.hpp isn't deprecated, it's fine where it
>> is.  But I like the idea that things built specifically for tr1
>> compatibility should go in boost/tr1/...
>
> boost/hash/ will do fine. <waves hand>

Yeah, that would've been best.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com