From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-01 09:34:14
Jody Hagins <jody-boost-011304_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:26:29 -0500
> "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> It's all good and interesting but would you prefer minimal testing
>> component? You stuck with a single BOOST_CHECK tool and couldn't
>> figure out why particular assertion fails. You could use debugger but
>> using BOOST_CHEKK_EQUAL would give you much more change to figure it
>> you quicker without one.
> Without a doubt, Boost.Test singlehandedly eliminated one of my biggest
> objections to test-first coding.
Which objection and how does Boost.Test eliminate it?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk