Re: [boost] [Release 1.34] Supported Compilers - another view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-01 09:34:14

Jody Hagins <jody-boost-011304_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:26:29 -0500
> "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> It's all good and interesting but would you prefer minimal testing 
>> component? You stuck with a single BOOST_CHECK tool and couldn't
>> figure out  why particular assertion fails. You could use debugger but
>> using  BOOST_CHEKK_EQUAL would give you much more change to figure it
>> you quicker  without one.
>
>
> Without a doubt, Boost.Test singlehandedly eliminated one of my biggest
> objections to test-first coding.  

Which objection and how does Boost.Test eliminate it?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com