Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-01 09:34:14

Jody Hagins <jody-boost-011304_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:26:29 -0500
> "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> It's all good and interesting but would you prefer minimal testing
>> component? You stuck with a single BOOST_CHECK tool and couldn't
>> figure out why particular assertion fails. You could use debugger but
>> using BOOST_CHEKK_EQUAL would give you much more change to figure it
>> you quicker without one.
> Without a doubt, Boost.Test singlehandedly eliminated one of my biggest
> objections to test-first coding.

Which objection and how does Boost.Test eliminate it?

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at