Re: [boost] [type_traits] Borland 2006 tests

From: Zara (yozara_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-02 03:58:11

On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 22:21:35 +0100, Nicola Musatti
<Nicola.Musatti_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>Zara wrote:
>> I am working for bcbboost, and I have begun making regression test,
>> going from basics upwards.
>> 
>> I have found  (with my current configuration) therer *hundreds* of
>> type_traits library tests that fail. I am trying to find a solution to
>> those, but I cannot keep from wondering, was BCB6 also failing, and it
>> is not important? Was it failing and nobody noticed? Am I failing to
>> see the evident, and all my work process is poisoned form the
>> beginning?
>
>If you are talking about the regression tests available in 1.33.1 the 
>current results for bcbboost CVS are the same for BCB2006 and BCB6, 
>about 50 test passed and 17 failed. You can browse the results here:
>http://bcbboost.sourceforge.net/test/current/cs-win32.html
>

Thank's for the link, I had not noticed it. BTW, does this mena we
must not try to pass the tests, they are impossible to pass?
Because if Borland is unable to pass the type_traits test (at least
the non-tricky ones), then many other libraries won't work.

Checking the results:

 I find is_union is markes 'Pass'g, but it is simply disconnected with
a warning, it still seems so.

I will test my config, as is_class fails on my tests.

And with my config tricy_is_enum is 'Pass', not 'Fail'

regards,

Zara