|
Boost : |
From: Sylvester-Bradley, Gareth (Gareth.Sylvester-Bradley_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-07 09:02:10
> unless there are major issues
I'm not sure what counts as major, but I guess most of the issues I raised
for Boost.Iostreams probably aren't (given the lack of replies to my
previous mail: http://tinyurl.com/mah8f)?
IMHO the significant performance problem I reported then for streams on
Seekable Indirect Devices *is* a big issue.
Is anyone else interested in this issue (or any of the others) and/or
reviewing my patch (it maybe too simplistic to cover all use-cases)?
FWIW, in a real world test case, using
* stream<file_descriptor> (from 1.33.1) resulted in total read bytes of ~250
MB
* std::fstream resulted in total read bytes of ~8 MB
* patched indirect_streambuf resulted in total read byte of ~8 MB
Thanks,
Gareth
************************************************************************
The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only.
This email and any response may be monitored by Sony to be in compliance with Sonys global policies and standards
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk