Re: [boost] boost::scoped_array::release?

From: Howard Hinnant (howard.hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-11 21:35:37

On Mar 11, 2006, at 9:04 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:

>
> "Howard Hinnant" <howard.hinnant_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:592D3A44-8F72-4BF6-90C3-0390413886A4_at_twcny.rr.com...
>> Fwiw, I've whipped up an independent C++03 emulation of unique_ptr.
>> It is based on Rani Sharoni's ideas here:
>>
>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#463
>>
>> It isn't perfect, but it could be useful prior to rvalue references.
>>
>> http://home.twcny.rr.com/hinnant/cpp_extensions/unique_ptr_03.html
>
> Hi Howard,
>
> Who is the copyright holder? You? Your employer? I try to encourage
> programmers to make the copyright message the first line of code  
> they write
> in a new source file. Mostly it doesn't matter, but every once in a  
> while
> saves a great deal of later grief.
>
> Ditto license. If you are in search of a good license, Boost  
> happens to have
> one available:-)

Thanks Beman,

I've purposefully not included a copyright statement, but my intent  
may not be properly framed.

How do you say:  I don't care about the copyright?  Copy it, trash  
it, do include my name or don't, I don't care.  It's only here for  
your amusement.  I'm attempting to post anonymously.

Btw, I neglected to include Ion's suggestion:

> If we can define the pointer type via deleter::pointer or similar
> (with default T*) that would be even better.
>

which I think is a good one.  Update on the way...

-Howard

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost