From: Howard Hinnant (howard.hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-11 21:35:37
On Mar 11, 2006, at 9:04 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
> "Howard Hinnant" <howard.hinnant_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> Fwiw, I've whipped up an independent C++03 emulation of unique_ptr.
>> It is based on Rani Sharoni's ideas here:
>> It isn't perfect, but it could be useful prior to rvalue references.
> Hi Howard,
> Who is the copyright holder? You? Your employer? I try to encourage
> programmers to make the copyright message the first line of code
> they write
> in a new source file. Mostly it doesn't matter, but every once in a
> saves a great deal of later grief.
> Ditto license. If you are in search of a good license, Boost
> happens to have
> one available:-)
I've purposefully not included a copyright statement, but my intent
may not be properly framed.
How do you say: I don't care about the copyright? Copy it, trash
it, do include my name or don't, I don't care. It's only here for
your amusement. I'm attempting to post anonymously.
Btw, I neglected to include Ion's suggestion:
> If we can define the pointer type via deleter::pointer or similar
> (with default T*) that would be even better.
which I think is a good one. Update on the way...
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk