Re: [boost] HP-UX aCC or boost problem?

From: Boris Gubenko (Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-14 13:40:34

>
> Really?  When did they switch?
>

In aCC6.

> I don't have an up to date version anymore as we long ago had to move
> to gcc because of aCC's woeful advanced C++/Boost support [...]
>

With aCC6, it is a totally different story.

Boris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Thomas Matelich" <matelich_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] HP-UX aCC or boost problem?

> On 3/13/06, Boris Gubenko <Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> > BTW: Is the aCC compiler somehow related to the Tru64 compiler?
>> >
>>
>> They both use the EDG front end.
>
> Really?  When did they switch?  When aCC began development, it was
> done by Daveed Vandevoorde who later joined EDG (IIRC), but I can't
> find anywhere that shows aCC uses EDG.
>
> I don't have an up to date version anymore as we long ago had to move
> to gcc because of aCC's woeful advanced C++/Boost support, so I can't
> check.
>
> If they were using it, it might be worthwhile to switch back for HP's
> better optimizing.
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
>